[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27aa8dc3-34b9-40e7-93bc-e52118b46138@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 15:32:28 +0530
From: Pratyush Brahma <quic_pbrahma@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>, <andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prakash Gupta
<quic_guptap@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs8300: Add device node for
gfx_smmu
On 1/9/2025 8:56 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8.01.2025 1:10 PM, Pratyush Brahma wrote:
>> On 12/30/2024 6:49 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 27.12.2024 12:00 PM, Pratyush Brahma wrote:
>>>> Add the device node for gfx smmu that is required for gpu
>>>> specific address translations.
>>>>
>>>> This patch depends on the patch series [1] posted by Imran Shaik
>>>> adding the clock support for gpu.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/802d32f1-ff7e-4d61-83f1-f804ee1750ed@oss.qualcomm.com/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Brahma <quic_pbrahma@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
>>>> index 80226992a65d..8eb688e2df0a 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs8300.dtsi
>>>> @@ -816,6 +816,43 @@
>>>> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>>> };
>>>> + adreno_smmu: iommu@...0000 {
>>>> + compatible = "qcom,qcs8300-smmu-500", "qcom,adreno-smmu",
>>>> + "qcom,smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500";
>>>> + reg = <0x0 0x3da0000 0x0 0x20000>;
>>>> + #iommu-cells = <2>;
>>>> + #global-interrupts = <2>;
>>>> + dma-coherent;
>>>> +
>>>> + power-domains = <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GDSC>;
>>>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>,
>>>> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_SNOC_DVM_GFX_CLK>,
>>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_AHB_CLK>,
>>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HLOS1_VOTE_GPU_SMMU_CLK>,
>>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GMU_CLK>,
>>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HUB_CX_INT_CLK>,
>>>> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_HUB_AON_CLK>;
>>>> + clock-names = "gcc_gpu_memnoc_gfx_clk",
>>>> + "gcc_gpu_snoc_dvm_gfx_clk",
>>>> + "gpu_cc_ahb_clk",
>>>> + "gpu_cc_hlos1_vote_gpu_smmu_clk",
>>>> + "gpu_cc_cx_gmu_clk",
>>>> + "gpu_cc_hub_cx_int_clk",
>>>> + "gpu_cc_hub_aon_clk";
>>> Most of these entries look totally bogus, please make sure you only
>>> reference the ones actually required
>> These entries are exactly similar to the ones we use in sa8775p as well [1] and the usecases
>> haven't changed between qcs8300 and sa8775p.
>>
>> Can you please let me know which entries you find irrelevant here?
> Well, I'm particularly unsure about CX_GMU and the HUB clocks.
> I >>don't think<< they don't have much to do with the SMMU, but please
> check internally with someone who knows for sure
I checked internally and found that these clocks are required for gpu
smmu operations
as we don't use interconnect voting mechanism here as we do downstream.
Hence the
list of clocks is same across all targets using gpu smmu as described in
[1] previously.
> Konrad
--
Thanks and Regards
Pratyush Brahma
Powered by blists - more mailing lists