linux-kernel - Re: [linus:master] [x86] 4817f70c25: stress-ng.mmapaddr.ops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46ea4509-0f38-4b22-bd91-f05c68db2562@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:05:17 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
 Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski
 <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
 David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
 Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
 Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>,
 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [x86] 4817f70c25: stress-ng.mmapaddr.ops_per_sec
 63.0% regression

On 28.01.25 10:57, kernel test robot wrote:
> 
> hi, Qi Zheng,
> 
> this is more a FYI report than a regression report.
> 
> by 4817f70c25, parent/4817f70c25 configs have below diff,
> 
> --- /pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel-9.4/gcc-12/718b13861d2256ac95d65b892953282a63faf240/.config  2025-01-27 16:20:43.419181382 +0800
> +++ /pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel-9.4/gcc-12/4817f70c25b63ee5e6fd42d376700c058ae16a96/.config  2025-01-26 09:27:16.848625105 +0800
> @@ -1236,6 +1236,8 @@ CONFIG_IOMMU_MM_DATA=y
>   CONFIG_EXECMEM=y
>   CONFIG_NUMA_MEMBLKS=y
>   CONFIG_NUMA_EMU=y
> +CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM=y
> +CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM=y
> 
>   #
>   # Data Access Monitoring
> 
> 
> this report seems show the impact of PT_CLAIM feature for this stress-ng case.
> 
> To us, this is not a code logic regression, but is kind of 'regression' from a
> new feature. anyway, below full report just FYI.

mmapaddr test case seems to mostly do mmap+munmap. No obvious sign of 
MADV_DONTNEED, unless buried somewhere :)

So either

(1) The series is reclaiming page tables outside of MADV_DONTNEED, which
     it shouldn't -- in particular not during munmap() where that happens
     already using the "ordinary" page table removal code for removed
     VMAs.

(2) This is the effect of MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE that gets selected?


I recall a recent series to select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE on x86 
unconditionally (@Peter, @Rik).

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb