lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250128113100.GB7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:31:00 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev,
	lkp@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@...gle.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [x86] 4817f70c25: stress-ng.mmapaddr.ops_per_sec
 63.0% regression

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 11:05:17AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 28.01.25 10:57, kernel test robot wrote:
> > 
> > hi, Qi Zheng,
> > 
> > this is more a FYI report than a regression report.
> > 
> > by 4817f70c25, parent/4817f70c25 configs have below diff,
> > 
> > --- /pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel-9.4/gcc-12/718b13861d2256ac95d65b892953282a63faf240/.config  2025-01-27 16:20:43.419181382 +0800
> > +++ /pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel-9.4/gcc-12/4817f70c25b63ee5e6fd42d376700c058ae16a96/.config  2025-01-26 09:27:16.848625105 +0800
> > @@ -1236,6 +1236,8 @@ CONFIG_IOMMU_MM_DATA=y
> >   CONFIG_EXECMEM=y
> >   CONFIG_NUMA_MEMBLKS=y
> >   CONFIG_NUMA_EMU=y
> > +CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_PT_RECLAIM=y
> > +CONFIG_PT_RECLAIM=y
> > 
> >   #
> >   # Data Access Monitoring
> > 
> > 
> > this report seems show the impact of PT_CLAIM feature for this stress-ng case.
> > 
> > To us, this is not a code logic regression, but is kind of 'regression' from a
> > new feature. anyway, below full report just FYI.
> 
> mmapaddr test case seems to mostly do mmap+munmap. No obvious sign of
> MADV_DONTNEED, unless buried somewhere :)
> 
> So either
> 
> (1) The series is reclaiming page tables outside of MADV_DONTNEED, which
>     it shouldn't -- in particular not during munmap() where that happens
>     already using the "ordinary" page table removal code for removed
>     VMAs.
> 
> (2) This is the effect of MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE that gets selected?
> 
> 
> I recall a recent series to select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE on x86
> unconditionally (@Peter, @Rik).

Those changes should not have made it to Linus yet.

/me updates git and checks...

nope, nothing changed there ... yet

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ