linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Use correct LDO5 control registers for PCA9450

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bce1bafa-aa90-4a1c-a2d3-cabbeb69e3f0@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:06:24 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Cc: Frieder Schrempf <frieder@...s.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Bo Liu <liubo03@...pur.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>,
	Joy Zou <joy.zou@....com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Use correct LDO5 control registers for PCA9450

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 08:44:28AM +0100, Frieder Schrempf wrote:

> I just want to ask kindly if there is any feedback for the driver and
> devicetree changes in this set?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)