linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 updates for 6.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABgObfYePuasEYAeC5NK2vNrNMAJ7b2GrGmyah9koAufZ2fayg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:06:35 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@....com, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	kernel-team@...roid.com, maz@...nel.org, oliver.upton@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM/arm64 updates for 6.14

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:02 PM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Linus, [+Paolo, Marc and Oliver]
>
> We've had a slight hiccup with the KVM/arm64 tree targetting 6.14 in
> that Paolo mistakenly forgot to include it in his KVM pull request [1].
> I understood Paolo was planning to send a follow-up pull request to you
> yesterday but, as that didn't materialise, I thought I'd better send it
> via arm64 given where we are in the merge window.

It was ready to go from my side as well, but I have no objection to
Linus pulling from here. My apologies to Marc, your pull request was
good and timely.

I had a couple more x86 fixes in my branch, but at this point they can
wait a few more days, in case I get other fixes from submaintainers.

Paolo