lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <622cfc1-28ea-8455-1372-4d4f76c7b613@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:10:25 -0800 (PST)
From: matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, 
    robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
    conor+dt@...nel.org, dinguyen@...nel.org, joyce.ooi@...el.com, 
    linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, matthew.gerlach@...era.com, 
    peter.colberg@...era.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] arm64: dts: agilex: add soc0 label



On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 27/01/2025 18:35, Matthew Gerlach wrote:
>> Add a label to the soc@0 device tree node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> v3:
>>  - Remove accepted patches from patch set.
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
>> index 1235ba5a9865..144fe74e929e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
>> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ usbphy0: usbphy {
>>  		compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
>>  	};
>>
>> -	soc@0 {
>> +	soc0: soc@0 {
> This shouldn't be a separate commit, really. It serves no purpose to
> just add the label. Just like you do not add just a define in a driver
> without its user. Label like this itself is pointless. It's useful for
> something, so this should be squashed.

I will squash this label change with the user of the lable.

Thanks for the review,
Matthew Gerlach

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ