[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6312f316-f407-494b-91c4-04d761396e22@postmarketos.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:29:31 +0300
From: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: gcc-sdm660: Add missing SDCC
resets
On 1/30/25 11:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:23:25AM +0300, Alexey Minnekhanov wrote:
>> Add resets for eMMC/SD card blocks that were missed during initial
>> driver submission.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
>> Fixes: f2a76a2955c0 ("clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SDM660")
>
> Your SoB is always the last tag, but repeating what I asked during
> previous review - what sort of bug is here? Missing feature is not a bug
> per se.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
I was hesitant about adding fixes tag myself, because there is no any
user-observable bug being fixed here. In fact the behavior is unchanged,
eMMC and SD worked fine before this and still work fine with this patch.
From Linux side this is mostly for consistency with other
younger/sibling SoCs, like MSM8998 & 8996 all have these resets
specified. This will probably be much more useful for U-Boot port.
Perhaps fixes tag should be removed completely?
--
Regards,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists