[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42879d73-e983-4246-83cd-a5bd55b02d32@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:06:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: clock: gcc-sdm660: Add missing SDCC
resets
On 30/01/2025 12:29, Alexey Minnekhanov wrote:
> On 1/30/25 11:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:23:25AM +0300, Alexey Minnekhanov wrote:
>>> Add resets for eMMC/SD card blocks that were missed during initial
>>> driver submission.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Minnekhanov <alexeymin@...tmarketos.org>
>>> Fixes: f2a76a2955c0 ("clk: qcom: Add Global Clock controller (GCC) driver for SDM660")
>>
>> Your SoB is always the last tag, but repeating what I asked during
>> previous review - what sort of bug is here? Missing feature is not a bug
>> per se.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> I was hesitant about adding fixes tag myself, because there is no any
> user-observable bug being fixed here. In fact the behavior is unchanged,
> eMMC and SD worked fine before this and still work fine with this patch.
> From Linux side this is mostly for consistency with other
> younger/sibling SoCs, like MSM8998 & 8996 all have these resets
> specified. This will probably be much more useful for U-Boot port.
>
> Perhaps fixes tag should be removed completely?
Yes, drop the Fixes tag.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists