[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d5b51e9-db32-4e46-97c8-2644081b7e33@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 08:13:37 +0100
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
<marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
regressions@...ts.linux.dev, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: Config space access to Mediatek MT7922 doesn't work after device
reset in Xen PV dom0 (regression, Linux 6.12)
On 30.01.2025 22:31, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:30:33AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 30.01.2025 05:55, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>>> (XEN) d0v1 conf read cf8 0x80010088 bytes 2 offset 2 data 0x9
>
> PCIe Cap at 0x80, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL is 0x08, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA is 0x0a.
>
> 0x80010088 would be PCI_EXP_DEVCTL (a 2-byte register), maybe offset 2
> gets us to PCI_EXP_DEVSTA? Not sure.
>
> 0x0001 PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_CED /* Correctable Error Detected */
> 0x0008 PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_URD /* Unsupported Request Detected */
>
> Not impossible that these would be set. Lots of URs happen during
> enumeration and we're not very good about cleaning these up.
> Correctable errors are common for some devices. lspci -vv would
> decode the PCIe cap registers, including this.
>
>>> (XEN) d0v1 conf read cf8 0x80010088 bytes 2 offset 0 data 0x2910
>
> PCI_EXP_DEVCTL:
> 0x2000 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_READRQ_512B
> 0x0800 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_NOSNOOP_EN
> 0x0100 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_EXT_TAG
> 0x0010 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN
>
>>> (XEN) d0v1 conf write cf8 0x80010088 bytes 2 offset 0 data 0xa910
>
> PCI_EXP_DEVCTL:
> set 0x8000 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_BCR_FLR
>
> This looks like the actual FLR being initiated.
>
>> This is the express capability's Link Control 2 Register afaict.
>
> Unless I'm missing something this is actually Device Control. So far
> I think this all looks OK. The next part:
What you say is very plausible as far as the observed behavior goes,
but: According to the lspci output provided earlier the express
capability is at 58 (hex). Hence here we're 30 (hex) into the
capability, which according to the spec I'm looking at is Link
Control 2. Yet as said - with what you say being plausible, likely
I'm simply getting something very wrong.
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists