linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/3] platform: arm64: Huawei Matebook E Go embedded controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <33f8a68f-46d8-472f-8061-52800e5bd014@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 22:20:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 Ilpo JÃ¤rvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
 Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/3] platform: arm64: Huawei Matebook E Go
 embedded controller

On 31/01/2025 10:21, Pengyu Luo wrote:
> This adds binding, drivers and the DT support for the Huawei Matebook E Go
> (sc8280xp-based) Embedded Controller which is also found in Huawei Matebook
> E Go LTE (sc8180x-based), but I don't have the sc8180x one to perform
> tests, so this series enable support for sc8280xp variant only, this series
> provides the following features:
> 
> - battery and charger information report
> - charging thresholds control
> - FN lock (An alternative method)
> - LID switch detection
> - Temperature sensors
> - USB Type-C altmode
> - USB Type-C PD(high power)
> 

Why are you resending?

Previous version was only week ago and minimal time is two weeks. Plus
its merge window, so this resend is unjustified.

Best regards,
Krzysztof