linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/3] platform: arm64: Huawei Matebook E Go embedded controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250201073838.3278-1-mitltlatltl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat,  1 Feb 2025 15:38:37 +0800
From: Pengyu Luo <mitltlatltl@...il.com>
To: krzk@...nel.org
Cc: andersson@...nel.org,
	bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	hdegoede@...hat.com,
	ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
	jdelvare@...e.com,
	konradybcio@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net,
	mitltlatltl@...il.com,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
	robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v6 0/3] platform: arm64: Huawei Matebook E Go embedded controller

On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 5:20 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 31/01/2025 10:21, Pengyu Luo wrote:
> > This adds binding, drivers and the DT support for the Huawei Matebook E Go
> > (sc8280xp-based) Embedded Controller which is also found in Huawei Matebook
> > E Go LTE (sc8180x-based), but I don't have the sc8180x one to perform
> > tests, so this series enable support for sc8280xp variant only, this series
> > provides the following features:
> >
> > - battery and charger information report
> > - charging thresholds control
> > - FN lock (An alternative method)
> > - LID switch detection
> > - Temperature sensors
> > - USB Type-C altmode
> > - USB Type-C PD(high power)
> >
>
> Why are you resending?
>
> Previous version was only week ago and minimal time is two weeks. Plus
> its merge window, so this resend is unjustified.

Sorry, I am still new to the process, I may have misunderstood something.
I sent it because I had got at leaset one reviewed tag for every patch
from the corresponding subsystem maintainer. Can I expect that there would
be no reviewing? All I need to do is wait for it to be applied.

For merge window, I noticed pr from platform-driver-x86 had been merged a
week ago. Maybe I shouldn't assume for every subsystem.

Best wishes,
Pengyu