[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6CTi5WVBwqI-QQ1@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:59:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: intel: Unify the way of handling chained
IRQ
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 02:47:43PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 04:49:38PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Some of the drivers are using the dedicated helpers (chained_irq_enter(),
> > chained_irq_exit() helpers) and some relies on the specific implementations
> > of the parent IRQ chip and its configuration. Update the latter ones to
> > use dedicated helpers that cover all possible scenarios.
> >
> > Andy Shevchenko (2):
> > pinctrl: baytrail: Use dedicated helpers for chained IRQ handlers
> > pinctrl: lynxpoint: Use dedicated helpers for chained IRQ handlers
>
> Both,
>
> Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists