[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZs9Y+GTHLeWBmpkaZrqiJGWj6s_q+6g=kkr7AmmeGMig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:31:17 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: Use dedicated helpers for
chained IRQ handlers
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 3:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Instead of relying on the fact that the parent IRQ chip supports
> fasteoi mode and calling the respective callback at the end of
> the interrupt handler, surround it with enter and exit helpers
> for chained IRQ handlers which will consider all possible cases.
>
> This in particular unifies how GPIO drivers handle IRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Looks fine to me, also 2/2.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Expect to get this from you as pull request!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists