linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9n6fFhmF+VruGNKjmoWh0hMHGS7xoEuceVMvZoJFb7avg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:16:57 -0500
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 7:17 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue 2025-02-04 05:27:23, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > Oops, meant to address this in the last reply.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 3:39 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Should this go via the printk tree, please?
> > > Or is David going to take it via the kunit tree?
> >
> > Going via printk would be my preference.
>
> I am fine with it. I assume that you are going to send v3 with
> the updated Makefile. Well, let's wait a bit for more potential
> feedback.
>
> Best Regards,
> Petr

I'll send v3 today - I'm adding an extra patch that breaks some tests
down into proper cases for better output.