linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z6IFPAuCz0_vDdB4@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 13:17:00 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

On Tue 2025-02-04 05:27:23, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Oops, meant to address this in the last reply.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 3:39 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> >
> > Should this go via the printk tree, please?
> > Or is David going to take it via the kunit tree?
> 
> Going via printk would be my preference.

I am fine with it. I assume that you are going to send v3 with
the updated Makefile. Well, let's wait a bit for more potential
feedback.

Best Regards,
Petr