[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00eeeb8b-cc28-42af-873f-3478cd22fb6e@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:39:07 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: steven chen <chenste@...ux.microsoft.com>, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
roberto.sassu@...weicloud.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
eric.snowberg@...cle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
code@...icks.com, bauermann@...abnow.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] ima: kexec: skip IMA segment validation after
kexec soft reboot
On 2/3/25 6:20 PM, steven chen wrote:
> kexec_calculate_store_digests() calculates and stores the digest of the
> segment at kexec_file_load syscall where the IMA segment is also
> allocated. With this series, the IMA segment will be updated with the
> measurement log at kexec excute stage when soft reboot is initiated.
s/excute/execute
> Therefore, it may fail digest verification in verify_sha256_digest()
> after kexec soft reboot into the new kernel. Therefore, the digest
> calculation/verification of the IMA segment needs to be skipped.
>
> Skip IMA segment from calculating and storing digest in function
Skip the calculation and storing of the digest of the IMA segment in
kexec_calculate_store_digests() so that ...
> kexec_calculate_store_digests() so that it is not added to the
> 'purgatory_sha_regions'.
>
> Since verify_sha256_digest() only verifies 'purgatory_sha_regions',
> no change is needed in verify_sha256_digest() in this context.
>
> With this change, the IMA segment is not included in the digest
> calculation, storage, and verification.
>
> Author: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: steven chen <chenste@...ux.microsoft.com>
> ---> include/linux/kexec.h | 3 +++
> kernel/kexec_file.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index f8413ea5c8c8..f3246e881ac8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ struct kimage {
>
> phys_addr_t ima_buffer_addr;
> size_t ima_buffer_size;
> +
> + unsigned long ima_segment_index;
> + bool is_ima_segment_index_set;
> #endif
>
> /* Core ELF header buffer */
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index 3eedb8c226ad..a3370a0dce20 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,22 @@ void set_kexec_sig_enforced(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
> +static bool check_ima_segment_index(struct kimage *image, int i)
> +{
> + if (image->is_ima_segment_index_set &&
> + i == image->ima_segment_index)
The 'i =' should be indented under 'image->'.
With these nits fixed:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> + return true;
> + else
> + return false;
> +}
> +#else
> +static bool check_ima_segment_index(struct kimage *image, int i)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image);
>
> /* Maximum size in bytes for kernel/initrd files. */
> @@ -764,6 +780,13 @@ static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image)
> if (ksegment->kbuf == pi->purgatory_buf)
> continue;
>
> + /*
> + * Skip the segment if ima_segment_index is set and matches
> + * the current index
> + */
> + if (check_ima_segment_index(image, i))
> + continue;
> +
> ret = crypto_shash_update(desc, ksegment->kbuf,
> ksegment->bufsz);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> index b60a902460e2..283860d20521 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> kbuf.buffer = kexec_buffer;
> kbuf.bufsz = kexec_buffer_size;
> kbuf.memsz = kexec_segment_size;
> + image->is_ima_segment_index_set = false;
> ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("Error passing over kexec measurement buffer.\n");
> @@ -172,6 +173,8 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image)
> image->ima_buffer_addr = kbuf.mem;
> image->ima_buffer_size = kexec_segment_size;
> image->ima_buffer = kexec_buffer;
> + image->ima_segment_index = image->nr_segments - 1;
> + image->is_ima_segment_index_set = true;
>
> /*
> * kexec owns kexec_buffer after kexec_add_buffer() is called
Powered by blists - more mailing lists