[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025020423-mahogany-skewed-9588@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 11:14:11 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
MaĆra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] driver core: add a faux bus for use when a simple
device/bus is needed
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 09:25:32AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:25:17 +0100
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Many drivers abuse the platform driver/bus system as it provides a
> > simple way to create and bind a device to a driver-specific set of
> > probe/release functions. Instead of doing that, and wasting all of the
> > memory associated with a platform device, here is a "faux" bus that
> > can be used instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> Nice. One trivial thing inline.
>
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/faux.c b/drivers/base/faux.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..0eba89a5cd57
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/base/faux.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
>
>
> > +int __init faux_bus_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + error = device_register(&faux_bus_root);
> > + if (error) {
> > + put_device(&faux_bus_root);
> > + return error;
> > + }
> > +
> > + error = bus_register(&faux_bus_type);
>
> Odd bonus space after =
Thanks! I caught that when I just rewrote this function, and I finally
got around to running checkpatch which found another error in it that I
missed. It's sometimes easier to notice changes in other's code than
your own :)
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists