lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74ac11e8-2285-436b-9186-4793cb2b7239@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 13:58:29 +0000
From: <Dharma.B@...rochip.com>
To: <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
	<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
	<Charan.Pedumuru@...rochip.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <Tony.Han@...rochip.com>,
	<Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: dma: at_xdmac: document dma-channels
 property

Hi Krzysztof,

On 05/02/25 5:10 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:17:03AM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>> Add document for the property "dma-channels" for XDMA controller.
> 
> I don't understand why. You are duplicating dma schema.
> 
> The same as with other patch - your commit msg is redundant. You say
> what we see the diff but you never explain why you are doing these
> changes. And in both cases this is really non-obvious.
> 
> Apply this feedback to all future contributions - say why you are doing
> changes instead of repeating what subject and diff are already saying.

Thanks for your feedback, do you want me to include the description of 
dma-channels from the diff in the commit message?

The reason for this change is:
"This property is required when the channel count cannot be read from 
the XDMAC_GTYPE register (which occurs when accessing from the 
non-secure world on certain devices)."

Isn't this already clear from the description in the diff?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 


-- 
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ