[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74ac11e8-2285-436b-9186-4793cb2b7239@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 13:58:29 +0000
From: <Dharma.B@...rochip.com>
To: <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>, <vkoul@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
<Charan.Pedumuru@...rochip.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <Tony.Han@...rochip.com>,
<Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: dma: at_xdmac: document dma-channels
property
Hi Krzysztof,
On 05/02/25 5:10 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 11:17:03AM +0530, Dharma Balasubiramani wrote:
>> Add document for the property "dma-channels" for XDMA controller.
>
> I don't understand why. You are duplicating dma schema.
>
> The same as with other patch - your commit msg is redundant. You say
> what we see the diff but you never explain why you are doing these
> changes. And in both cases this is really non-obvious.
>
> Apply this feedback to all future contributions - say why you are doing
> changes instead of repeating what subject and diff are already saying.
Thanks for your feedback, do you want me to include the description of
dma-channels from the diff in the commit message?
The reason for this change is:
"This property is required when the channel count cannot be read from
the XDMAC_GTYPE register (which occurs when accessing from the
non-secure world on certain devices)."
Isn't this already clear from the description in the diff?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
--
With Best Regards,
Dharma B.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists