[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc9d5253-9e78-4b12-8b1c-96c97b0f4438@xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:32:46 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>, quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com,
quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, sebastian.fricke@...labora.com,
bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
neil.armstrong@...aro.org, nicolas@...fresne.ca,
u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, stefan.schmidt@...aro.org,
lujianhua000@...il.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 27/28] media: iris: enable video driver probe of
SM8250 SoC
On 05/02/2025 15:21, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> This discussion about probing the driver is holding up the merging of this
>> driver unnecessarily. For now, only support the iris driver for SM8250 SoC
>> if the venus driver is not enabled:
>>
>> #if !IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_VENUS)
>>
>> That should be uncontroversial, and allows us to merge the iris driver.
>
> Sounds good to me, but that should be IS_ENABLED() as otherwise which
> driver ends up binding depends on whether venus is built as a module or
> not.
You are right, good catch.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists