[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6Nz5r8Z1BhtD2KZ@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 15:21:26 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>, quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com,
quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
sebastian.fricke@...labora.com, bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
nicolas@...fresne.ca, u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com,
stefan.schmidt@...aro.org, lujianhua000@...il.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v10 27/28] media: iris: enable video driver probe of
SM8250 SoC
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:15:25PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> This discussion about probing the driver is holding up the merging of this
> driver unnecessarily. For now, only support the iris driver for SM8250 SoC
> if the venus driver is not enabled:
>
> #if !IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_VIDEO_QCOM_VENUS)
>
> That should be uncontroversial, and allows us to merge the iris driver.
Sounds good to me, but that should be IS_ENABLED() as otherwise which
driver ends up binding depends on whether venus is built as a module or
not.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists