[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250205161636.GA1001@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 17:16:37 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>,
Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>,
WangYuli <wangyuli@...ontech.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pipe: introduce struct file_operations
pipeanon_fops
On 02/05, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 07:34, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > So that fifos and anonymous pipes could have different f_op methods.
> > Preparation to simplify the next patch.
>
> Looks good, except:
>
> > +++ b/fs/internal.h
> > extern const struct file_operations pipefifo_fops;
> > +extern const struct file_operations pipeanon_fops;
>
> I think this should just be 'static' to inside fs/pipe.c, no?
I swear, this is what I did initially ;)
But then for some reason I thought someone would ask me to export
pipeanon_fops along with pipefifo_fops for consistency.
OK, I will wait for other reviews and send V3.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists