linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] scripts/sorttable: ftrace: Do not add weak functions to available_filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4c7f0931742c8636a82f2ae3b3c492c93266c93.camel@crowdstrike.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 16:00:00 +0000
From: Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@...wdstrike.com>
To: "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "masahiroy@...nel.org"
	<masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "zhengyejian1@...wei.com" <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>,
        "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com"
	<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org"
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>,
        "nicolas@...sle.eu" <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] scripts/sorttable: ftrace: Do not add weak
 functions to available_filter_functions

On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 19:35 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:13:26 +0000
> Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@...wdstrike.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'm not necessarily a qualified reviewer for this patch, but I'm
> > very
> > interested in seeing it or a similar solution get merged, as the
> > impact
> > when it hits is significant (silent failure) and not easy to detect
> > or
> > work around. Is there any obstacle left in getting this one merged
> > other than further reviews?
> 
> A version of the patches 1-14 was merged this merge window, with some
> tweaks. I plan on rebasing patches 15 and 16 on top of that and
> resubmitting. I just have some other things I'm finishing up.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Steve

Awesome, thanks!