linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] scripts/sorttable: ftrace: Do not add weak functions to available_filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250204193559.1f87b4ea@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:35:59 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@...wdstrike.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, "masahiroy@...nel.org"
 <masahiroy@...nel.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org"
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
 "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "mark.rutland@....com"
 <mark.rutland@....com>, "mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com"
 <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, "mhiramat@...nel.org"
 <mhiramat@...nel.org>, "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org"
 <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "nicolas@...sle.eu" <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
 "nathan@...nel.org" <nathan@...nel.org>, "zhengyejian1@...wei.com"
 <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
 <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/16] scripts/sorttable: ftrace: Do not add weak
 functions to available_filter_functions

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:13:26 +0000
Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@...wdstrike.com> wrote:

> I'm not necessarily a qualified reviewer for this patch, but I'm very
> interested in seeing it or a similar solution get merged, as the impact
> when it hits is significant (silent failure) and not easy to detect or
> work around. Is there any obstacle left in getting this one merged
> other than further reviews?

A version of the patches 1-14 was merged this merge window, with some
tweaks. I plan on rebasing patches 15 and 16 on top of that and
resubmitting. I just have some other things I'm finishing up.

Thanks,

-- Steve