[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6MC+WUALT3H6unG@mev-dev.igk.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 07:19:37 +0100
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethernet: mtk_ppe_offload: Allow QinQ
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 08:46:24PM +0100, Eric Woudstra wrote:
> mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan() in mtk_ppe.c already seems to support
> double vlan tagging, but mtk_flow_offload_replace() in
> mtk_ppe_offload.c only allows for 1 vlan tag, optionally in
> combination with pppoe and dsa tags.
>
> This patch adds QinQ support to mtk_flow_offload_replace().
>
> Only PPPoE-in-Q (as before) and Q-in-Q are allowed. A combination
> of PPPoE and Q-in-Q is not allowed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Since the RFC v1 did not recieve any comments, I'm sending v2 as PATCH
> unchanged.
>
> Tested on the BPI-R3(mini), on non-dsa-ports and dsa-ports.
>
> .../net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c | 21 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c
> index f20bb390df3a..c19789883a9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_ppe_offload.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,10 @@ struct mtk_flow_data {
> u16 vlan_in;
>
> struct {
> - u16 id;
> - __be16 proto;
> + struct {
> + u16 id;
> + __be16 proto;
> + } vlans[2];
> u8 num;
> } vlan;
> struct {
> @@ -349,18 +351,19 @@ mtk_flow_offload_replace(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f,
> case FLOW_ACTION_CSUM:
> break;
> case FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH:
> - if (data.vlan.num == 1 ||
> + if (data.vlan.num + data.pppoe.num == 2 ||
> act->vlan.proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - data.vlan.id = act->vlan.vid;
> - data.vlan.proto = act->vlan.proto;
> + data.vlan.vlans[data.vlan.num].id = act->vlan.vid;
> + data.vlan.vlans[data.vlan.num].proto = act->vlan.proto;
> data.vlan.num++;
> break;
> case FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_POP:
> break;
> case FLOW_ACTION_PPPOE_PUSH:
> - if (data.pppoe.num == 1)
> + if (data.pppoe.num == 1 ||
> + data.vlan.num == 2)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> data.pppoe.sid = act->pppoe.sid;
> @@ -450,11 +453,11 @@ mtk_flow_offload_replace(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct flow_cls_offload *f,
> if (offload_type == MTK_PPE_PKT_TYPE_BRIDGE)
> foe.bridge.vlan = data.vlan_in;
>
> - if (data.vlan.num == 1) {
> - if (data.vlan.proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q))
> + for (i = 0; i < data.vlan.num; i++) {
> + if (data.vlan.vlans[i].proto != htons(ETH_P_8021Q))
It is already checked in FLOW_ACTION_VLAN_PUSH, so data.vlan.num can't be
increased if proto is different. No need to check it again.
Other than that rest looks fine.
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan(eth, &foe, data.vlan.id);
> + mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan(eth, &foe, data.vlan.vlans[i].id);
> }
> if (data.pppoe.num == 1)
> mtk_foe_entry_set_pppoe(eth, &foe, data.pppoe.sid);
> --
> 2.47.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists