linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: ad5398: Correct the SW_POWER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2a0f24c61de73f7bd2bb495d697dcedd8462f4c0.camel@ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 12:45:28 +0000
From: Isaac Scott <isaac.scott@...asonboard.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: michael.hennerich@...log.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: ad5398: Correct the SW_POWER_DOWN bit
 number

Hi Mark,

On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 12:28 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:24:59PM +0000, Isaac Scott wrote:
> > The datasheet for the AD5398 regulator indicates that the Soft
> > power
> > down bit is bit 15, not 16 as represented in the driver. Correct
> > this to
> > ensure the functionality is implemented correctly.
> 
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.

I have checked, and it applies on top of linux-next next-20250206,
which includes my previous patch you have already applied:

[1/3] regulator: ad5398: change enable bit name to improve readibility
      commit: 19d022d67d7353f0e6e9ba255435d3de93862ac4
[3/3] regulator: ad5398: Add device tree support
      commit: 5a6a461079decea452fdcae955bccecf92e07e97

Have I applied it to the wrong branch?

Thank you very much,

Best wishes,

Isaac