linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: ad5398: Correct the SW_POWER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f81d5101-1dd2-4ff4-9a23-403b6efbcdf3@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:58:35 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Isaac Scott <isaac.scott@...asonboard.com>
Cc: michael.hennerich@...log.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: ad5398: Correct the SW_POWER_DOWN bit
 number

On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 12:45:28PM +0000, Isaac Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 12:28 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.

> I have checked, and it applies on top of linux-next next-20250206,
> which includes my previous patch you have already applied:

> [1/3] regulator: ad5398: change enable bit name to improve readibility
>       commit: 19d022d67d7353f0e6e9ba255435d3de93862ac4
> [3/3] regulator: ad5398: Add device tree support
>       commit: 5a6a461079decea452fdcae955bccecf92e07e97

> Have I applied it to the wrong branch?

You didn't include a Fixes tag or otherwise mention that this was a fix
for a recent change so I was applying this as a fix for Linus' tree.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)