[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202502081316.685D547624@keescook>
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 13:16:30 -0800
From: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>,
Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>,
Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@...adcom.com,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] x86/tdx: Mark message.str as nonstring
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 02:09:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 4:37 AM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 05:12:11PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On 2/6/25 17:00, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > So, the patch itself makes sense. But it does end up looking kinda
> > > funky. We call it a "str"ing and then annotate it as not a string.
> >
> > Yeah, this is true all over the place. It's a string, just not a
> > NUL-terminated string: *sob*
>
> Maybe call it respectively, e.g., __nontermstr ?
I don't want to change its name from the GCC attribute. I think that's
just asking more more confusion.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists