[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75r5wrrxaxlw4ksb4gxpt2njusmr4cyohdut4iyxqxkziv6r54@uf22so3ics4c>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:53:50 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Sathya Prakash <sathya.prakash@...adcom.com>, Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com>,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>, Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>, "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Sven Eckelmann <sven@...fation.org>, Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Erick Archer <erick.archer@...look.com>,
Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@...dex.ru>, Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, mpi3mr-linuxdrv.pdl@...adcom.com,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] x86/tdx: Mark message.str as nonstring
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 06:37:27PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 05:12:11PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 2/6/25 17:00, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c
> > > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void __noreturn tdx_panic(const char *msg)
> > > /* Define register order according to the GHCI */
> > > struct { u64 r14, r15, rbx, rdi, rsi, r8, r9, rdx; };
> > >
> > > - char str[64];
> > > + char str[64] __nonstring;
> > > } message;
> >
> > So, the patch itself makes sense. But it does end up looking kinda
> > funky. We call it a "str"ing and then annotate it as not a string.
>
> Yeah, this is true all over the place. It's a string, just not a
> NUL-terminated string: *sob*
>
> > It doesn't have to be done in this patch, but it does seem like we
> > should probably not be using 'char' and also shouldn't call it anything
> > close to "string". Maybe:
> >
> > u8 message[64] __nonstring;
> > } message;
>
> message.message ;)
>
> message.chars?
> message.bytes?
.bytes sounds good to me.
Anyway:
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists