[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210162507.GB1264@sol.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:25:07 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Gaurav Kashyap <quic_gaurkash@...cinc.com>,
linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/7] Support for hardware-wrapped inline encryption
keys
Hi Jens,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:00:34PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> This is targeting 6.15. As per the suggestion from Jens
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/c3407d1c-6c5c-42ee-b446-ccbab1643a62@kernel.dk/),
> I'd like patches 1-3 to be queued up into a branch that gets pulled into
> the block tree. I'll then take patches 4-7 through the fscrypt tree,
> also for 6.15. If I end up with too many merge conflicts by trying to
> take patches 5-7 (given that this is a cross-subsystem feature), my
> fallback plan will be to wait until 6.16 to land patches 5-7, when they
> will finally be unblocked by the block patches having landed.
Let me know what you think about this plan.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists