[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210235254.s66vwnh5fvxhvjej@jpoimboe>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:52:54 -0800
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/35] x86/bugs: Restructure gds mitigation
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:24:50PM -0600, David Kaplan wrote:
> @@ -902,7 +909,7 @@ static void __init gds_select_mitigation(void)
> } else {
> gds_mitigation = GDS_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED;
> }
> - goto out;
> + return;
So right above this it clears X86_FEATURE_AVX, should that not be
deferred until gds_apply_mitigation()?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists