lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAyq3Sb4WZtjq6-jYqHYympSxLgf=Oifcf2BmV+pVLJGc8=oYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:27:04 +0800
From: Cheng Ming Lin <linchengming884@...il.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Cc: pratyush@...nel.org, mwalle@...nel.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, 
	richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alvinzhou@...c.com.tw, leoyu@...c.com.tw, 
	Cheng Ming Lin <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Add post_sfdp fixups for Quad
 Input Page Program

Hi Tudor,

Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org> 於 2025年2月7日 週五 下午4:37寫道:
>
> Hi, Cheng,
>
> On 2/7/25 8:18 AM, Cheng Ming Lin wrote:
> > Although certain Macronix NOR flash support the Quad Input Page Program
> > feature, the corresponding information in the 4-byte Address Instruction
> > Table of these flash is not properly filled. As a result, this feature
> > cannot be enabled as expected.
>
> You need to prove that all the flashes that you touch need this fixup,
> i.e. dump their SFDP and show where's the wrong bit in the SFDP table.

Okay, I will dump the SFDP for each of them and point out the
specific errors in the SFDP tables.

>
> Identifying wrong bit in the SFDP tables would be easy to spot if we had
> a SFDP decoder. Something that we all agree that'd be a good thing to
> have, but nobody can allocate time to do it. Pratyush I remember has
> started a draft. Are you interested in introducing a SFDP decoder in
> mtd-utils?
>
> Also, if you touch all these flashes, will you please update them and
> get rid of the stray flash info fields? I'm thinking of name, size, and
> no_sfdp_flags.

No problem. Would removing these stray flash info fields from the
Macronix flash warrant a separate patch series, or should it be included
with the current changes?

>
> Cheers,
> ta

Thanks,
Cheng Ming Lin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ