[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250210120625.nNiVxgOJ@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:06:25 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] x86: Rely on generic printing of preemption model.
On 2025-02-03 15:16:30 [+0100], To linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org wrote:
> After __die_header(), __die_body() is always invoked. There we have
> show_regs() -> show_regs_print_info() which prints the current
> preemption model.
> Remove it from the initial line.
>
> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Is it okay, to route this via the sched tree?
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists