[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xn1pw6o63l.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 22:01:50 -0500
From: DJ Delorie <dj@...hat.com>
To: Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>
Cc: miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, eblake@...hat.com, will.newton@...aro.org,
eggert@...ucla.edu, linux-man@...r.kernel.org, dakr@...nel.org,
tamird@...il.com, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com,
tmgross@...ch.edu, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: alloc: satisfy `aligned_alloc` requirements
Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org> writes:
> On retrospective, we should have added some more details to that commit
> message. DJ, has the requirement of the size been lifted? Was it never
> present?
The current code checks alignment but not size.
It looks like that was always the case.
And no, I don't remember where I got the size requirement from ;-)
(but at least it says "should" instead of "must")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists