linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: ASoC: rockchip: Add compatible for RK3588 SPDIF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <870305083.0ifERbkFSE@diego>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:04:22 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
 Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: ASoC: rockchip: Add compatible for RK3588 SPDIF

Hi Mark,

Am Montag, 10. Februar 2025, 14:20:58 MEZ schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 10:10:47PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 20. Januar 2025, 10:01:27 MEZ schrieb Alexey Charkov:
> > > Add a compatible string for SPDIF on RK3588, which is similar to the
> > > one on RK3568.
> 
> > as the binding is more in the driver-realm, is this patch still
> > somewhere on your radar?
> 
> Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
> for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
> on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
> please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
> review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
>
> Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
> all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> for the subsystem are normally handled.

With it being 3 weeks since the patch was originally posted, I thought
it might be the time to ask if the binding-patch was still around.

I vaguely do remember you saying in the past that if a patch hasn't
been applied/handled after X time-units, it wouldn't be in your inbox
anymore, but am not sure anymore ;-) .