linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: ASoC: rockchip: Add compatible for RK3588 SPDIF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8cf5071c-0f3e-4a5c-8866-571aff717974@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:28:06 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: ASoC: rockchip: Add compatible for
 RK3588 SPDIF

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 03:04:22PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 10. Februar 2025, 14:20:58 MEZ schrieb Mark Brown:

> > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > for the subsystem are normally handled.

> With it being 3 weeks since the patch was originally posted, I thought
> it might be the time to ask if the binding-patch was still around.

> I vaguely do remember you saying in the past that if a patch hasn't
> been applied/handled after X time-units, it wouldn't be in your inbox
> anymore, but am not sure anymore ;-) .

A big part of what that form letter is saying is that it's better to
chase by resending since that ensures that if things have been lost the
actual thing that you're looking for action on is right here.  If you
just send a ping either it'll get buried along with the original patch
or there won't be information to hand.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)