[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUM9+xTF_UEitagNvprjuXQ+=oo_ey=gN731v2QckXxug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:17:33 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform: cznic: CZNIC_PLATFORMS should depend on
MACH_ARMADA_38X || ARCH_MVEBU
Hi Arnd,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 12:04, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025, at 11:56, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > CZ.NIC's Turris devices are based on Marvell Armada 385 or 3720 SoCs.
> > Hence add dependencies on MACH_ARMADA_38X and ARCH_MVEBU, to prevent
> > asking the user about these drivers when configuring a kernel that
> > cannot run on an affected CZ.NIC Turris system.
> >
> > Fixes: 992f1a3d4e88498d ("platform: cznic: Add preliminary support for
> > Turris Omnia MCU")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Drop PPC_P2020 from the dependency list.
>
> Looks good to me, one minor issue:
>
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> >
> > menuconfig CZNIC_PLATFORMS
> > bool "Platform support for CZ.NIC's Turris hardware"
> > + depends on MACH_ARMADA_38X || ARCH_MVEBU || COMPILE_TEST
>
> Technically the MACH_ARMADA_38X check is redundant here, as that
> already requires ARCH_MVEBU.
Thanks for your comment!
Somehow I thought the former covers arm32, and the latter arm64,
but ARCH_MVEBU indeed covers both.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists