[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D7PSNJVIIQ6Q.99BIJKP7H2YU@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:31:34 -0500
From: "Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@...il.com>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, "Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@....de>, "Mario
Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@....com>, "Hans de Goede"
<hdegoede@...hat.com>, <Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/14] platform/x86: Rename alienware-wmi.c
Hi Andy,
Thank you for your review!
On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 11:41 AM -05, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 10:46:05AM -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
>> Rename alienware-wmi to support upcoming split.
>
> (the change that is caught by my eye and induced this review session)
>
> ...
>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ALIENWARE_WMI) += alienware-wmi.o
>> +alienware-wmi-objs := alienware-wmi-base.o
>
> objs is incorrect! Please use correct y instead.
I want to understand what is exactly wrong here. This `objs` pattern is
used a lot in this file, so I just copied it. For example [1].
Is it wrong to do it here for a single file? Is it wrong to do it at
all?
My goal is to split the file, but link it all together in a single
module.
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc2/source/drivers/platform/x86/dell/Makefile#L14
--
~ Kurt
>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DCDBAS) += dcdbas.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DELL_LAPTOP) += dell-laptop.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DELL_RBTN) += dell-rbtn.o
Powered by blists - more mailing lists