linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: finish converting register to FIELD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bjv8sqcl.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:55:22 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,  Richard
 Weinberger <richard@....at>,  Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
  linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,  linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: finish converting register to
 FIELD_PREP

Hi Christian,

>> I'm fine with your two patches. I was about to apply them, but the first
>> one needs to go through fixes, whereas the second through next, and they
>> are dependent on each other. I propose the following modification:
>> - create patch 1/2 with the content of the cleanup done just below, but
>>   only adapted to the very specific spot that is touched by the fix "fix
>>   broken config...". It would be a prerequisite for the fix.
>> - patch 2/2 would be the content of "fix broken config..."
>> 
>> And aside, a totally independent patch easy to apply on -rc1 with the
>> rest of this patch.
>> 
>> Would that work for you?
>>
>
> Mhhh are they really dependent on each other?
>
> I posted them in 2 separate patch as one should have priority and be
> applied ASAP. The other is really a cleanup and from what I can see no
> delta in the patch gets affected by the fix in the other patch.
>
> In theory they should apply independently.

Ah ok, I must have misread them, fine then.

Thanks,
Miquèl