[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250212085918.6902-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:59:18 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
While it now returns void, it will soon be converted to return an
integer instead. Don't do `return gpiod_set...`.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502121512.CmoMg9Q7-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
---
drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
index 08cca128458c..fe223d363a5d 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void aw200xx_enable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
static void aw200xx_disable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
{
- return gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
+ gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
}
static int aw200xx_probe_get_display_rows(struct device *dev,
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists