lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdFwe2onYhwY__n-kAOSrXKKDWJ38hpbYb0711Nx60DHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:02:33 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:59 AM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> While it now returns void, it will soon be converted to return an
> integer instead. Don't do `return gpiod_set...`.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502121512.CmoMg9Q7-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> index 08cca128458c..fe223d363a5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-aw200xx.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static void aw200xx_enable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
>
>  static void aw200xx_disable(const struct aw200xx *const chip)
>  {
> -       return gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
> +       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(chip->hwen, 0);
>  }
>
>  static int aw200xx_probe_get_display_rows(struct device *dev,
> --
> 2.45.2
>

Lee, Pavel:

If this is OK for you, can you please provide me with an immutable
branch so that I can pull it into the GPIO tree? It seems it's the
only such use-case in the tree apart from the gpio.h header that I can
fix locally. Alternatively you can just Ack this and let me take it
through the GPIO tree.

Bartosz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ