[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b7780ee-6dbe-4e2a-8d7f-4057e83c767e@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 14:31:30 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
Aishwarya TCV <Aishwarya.TCV@....com>
Subject: Re: kvm: nVHE hyp panic at: __kvm_nvhe_kvm_hyp_handle_sysre
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36:31AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:24:06 +0000,
> Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Regression on rk3399-rock-pi-4b while running kvm-unit-tests with
> > nvhe, protected and vhe mode with virtualization enabled.
>
> I do not buy this. RK3399 only has ARMv8.0 cores, which by definition
> do not have VHE.
>
The links to the dmesg are at the bottom of the email. It does seem to
be a RK3399 with ARMv8.0 cores though as you say...
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/8117232#L1395
We'll test the patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists