linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] intel_idle: introduce 'no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21e66060c13c6a3cc33592f71cb08975711a6adb.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 13:32:14 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>, 
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Jacob
 Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Prarit
 Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] intel_idle: introduce 'no_native' module parameter

On Wed, 2025-02-12 at 18:09 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>    drivers/idle/intel_idle.c: In function 'intel_idle_init':
> > > drivers/idle/intel_idle.c:2289:27: error: 'no_acpi' undeclared (first use
> > > in this function); did you mean 'no_action'?
>     2289 |         if (no_native && !no_acpi) {
>          |                           ^~~~~~~
>          |                           no_action
>    drivers/idle/intel_idle.c:2289:27: note: each undeclared identifier is
> reported only once for each function it appears in

David, this must be the !CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE case.

Thanks!