linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 10/18] zsmalloc: factor out pool locking helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cbbcq3vklpcrwizvbjupsyczcv7ccnygys7pg3njbrpostw2lh@7kwgdoopeyy4>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:54:14 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>, 
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/18] zsmalloc: factor out pool locking helpers

On (25/02/13 01:12), Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> > I want to hide the details, keep them in one place and at some
> > 
> > point *in the future* have the same "locking rules" as for zspage
> > 
> > lock. Also *possibly* throwing a couple of lockdep assertions.
> > 
> > So I'd prefer to abstract all of these.
> 
> 
> I'd prefer to introduce the abstractions when they are needed tbh. Right now they just make the code less readable.

OK, gone now.  I think I didn't screw things up resolving the conflicts.