[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ifhsimzwxwsthkwniv4o6rzi54yj34g2yl4ontzdsapufhi2vc@uaamvirr3533>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 17:49:00 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>, Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] zram: sleepable entry locking
On (25/02/13 10:42), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (25/02/13 09:52), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > > > -static int zram_slot_trylock(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
> > > > +static void zram_slot_lock_init(struct zram *zram, u32 index)
> > > > {
> > > > - return spin_trylock(&zram->table[index].lock);
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > > > + lockdep_init_map(&zram->table[index].lockdep_map, "zram-entry->lock",
> > > > + &zram->table_lockdep_key, 0);
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > > > + lockdep_register_key(&zram->table_lockdep_key);
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Please check whether all the ifdefs are needed - some of these things
> > > have CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n stubs.
>
> The problem is that while functions have LOCKDEP=n stubs, struct members
> don't - we still declare table_lockdep_key and lockdep_map only when
> DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is enabled.
I rewrote those bits (in zram and in zsmalloc), given that we also
need lock-contended/lock-acquired in various branches, which require
even more ifdef-s. So I factored out debug-enabled variants.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists