[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e58310a9-0fd7-44fa-b66b-b98502dbed30@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 21:17:10 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com,
seiden@...ux.ibm.com, nsg@...ux.ibm.com, schlameuss@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] KVM: s390: fix issues when splitting folios
> + struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> int rc;
>
> lockdep_assert_not_held(&mm->mmap_lock);
> @@ -2645,7 +2646,11 @@ int kvm_s390_wiggle_split_folio(struct mm_struct *mm, struct folio *folio, bool
> lru_add_drain_all();
> if (split) {
> folio_lock(folio);
> - rc = split_folio(folio);
> + rc = min_order_for_split(folio);
> + if (rc > 0)
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + if (!rc)
> + rc = split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, 0);
split_huge_page() ?
But see my reply to #2. Likely we should just undo the refactorings you
added while moving the code.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists