[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250213055825.GD19370@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:58:25 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: skip CMB blocks incompatible with PCI
P2P DMA
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:04:44AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> + /*
> + * Controllers may support a CMB size larger than their BAR,
> + * for example, due to being behind a bridge. Reduce the CMB to
> + * the reported size of the BAR
> + */
> + if (size > bar_size - offset)
> + size = bar_size - offset;
Nit: use up the full 80 characters for the comment, and maybe switch
the above expression to use the min() helper.
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(size, memremap_compat_align()) ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED(pci_resource_start(pdev, bar),
> + memremap_compat_align()))
These compat names looked odd to me, but it looks like they are indeed
the proper interface here. So modulo the little style things above
this looks good, thanks a lot!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists