linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm/tcpci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58af4b607adbe74725d4869f8f5a09cd5d3be2d3.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:44:59 +0000
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Griffin
 <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Will
 McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tcpm/tcpci_maxim: better interrupt name

Hi Greg,

On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 11:11 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:37:54AM +0000, André Draszik wrote:
> > This changes the output of /proc/interrupts from the non-descriptive:
> >     1-0025
> > (or similar) to a more descriptive:
> >     1-0025-max33359
> > 
> > This makes it easier to find the device, in particular if there are
> > multiple i2c devices, as one doesn't have to remember (or lookup) where
> > it is located.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c
> > index fd1b80593367..46fc626589db 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpci_maxim_core.c
> > @@ -420,12 +420,14 @@ static irqreturn_t max_tcpci_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >  	return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
> >  }
> >  
> > -static int max_tcpci_init_alert(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip, struct i2c_client *client)
> > +static int max_tcpci_init_alert(struct max_tcpci_chip *chip,
> > +				struct i2c_client *client,
> > +				const char *name)
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(chip->dev, client->irq, max_tcpci_isr, max_tcpci_irq,
> > -					(IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT), dev_name(chip->dev),
> > +					(IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT), name,
> >  					chip);
> >  
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> > @@ -485,6 +487,7 @@ static int max_tcpci_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> >  	int ret;
> >  	struct max_tcpci_chip *chip;
> >  	u8 power_status;
> > +	const char *name;
> >  
> >  	chip = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!chip)
> > @@ -531,7 +534,11 @@ static int max_tcpci_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> >  
> >  	chip->port = tcpci_get_tcpm_port(chip->tcpci);
> >  
> > -	ret = max_tcpci_init_alert(chip, client);
> > +	name = devm_kasprintf(&client->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s",
> > +			      dev_name(&client->dev), client->name);
> > +	if (!name)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> Please always test your code before sending it out.  You just leaked a
> bunch of stuff here :(

Thanks for the review!

I can not see what leak you're referring to. Could you please clarify?

Thanks,
Andre'