[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250214163758.00002f4b@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:37:58 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
CC: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma
<vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Dan Williams
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, "Davidlohr
Bueso" <dave@...olabs.net>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>, "Fabio M.
De Francesco" <fabio.m.de.francesco@...ux.intel.com>, Terry Bowman
<terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/18] cxl/acpi: Unify CFMWS memory log messages with
SRAT messages
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:53:48 +0100
Robert Richter <rrichter@....com> wrote:
> CFMWS entries have a similar importance as SRAT table entries to
> describe memory regions. For CXL error analysis and memory debugging
> information of both is needed. Unify output of both messages to
> improve logging. Change the style of CFMWS message according to SRAT
> output. Also, turn messages into a dev_info() same as for SRAT.
>
> SRAT pr_info() for reference:
>
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:
> pr_info("SRAT: Node %u PXM %u [mem %#010Lx-%#010Lx]%s%s\n",
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
> Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists