lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf264b5f-be03-af53-3de3-a97051f9577e@gentwo.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 10:22:08 -0800 (PST)
From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
    Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
    Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, 
    "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, 
    Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] x86/locking: Use ALT_OUTPUT_SP() for
 percpu_{,try_}cmpxchg{64,128}_op()

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Uros Bizjak wrote:

> OTOH, all recent x86_64 processors support CMPXCHG128 insn, so the
> call alternative will be rarely used.

Do we still support processors without cmpxchg128? If not then lets just
drop the calls from the kernel.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ