lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4YMNsSzNS8wBZBC8iy2uNnoV8kDWpp70r4Wx+-wJ1j1Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 20:55:09 +0100
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" <cl@...two.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, 
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, 
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, 
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] x86/locking: Use ALT_OUTPUT_SP() for percpu_{,try_}cmpxchg{64,128}_op()

On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 7:22 PM Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
<cl@...two.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> > OTOH, all recent x86_64 processors support CMPXCHG128 insn, so the
> > call alternative will be rarely used.
>
> Do we still support processors without cmpxchg128? If not then lets just
> drop the calls from the kernel.

I'm not aware of any discussion about that decision.

Thanks,
Uros.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ